It is either an amazing marketing move, or diabolical. It’s almost as if Sony is telling you to future-proof yourself by living in the future… on your own… with no one else to experience the future with. I understand that someone has to be the first penguin for 4K — the first one to dive in and be eaten by a killer whale — and I don’t think anyone would call me a Luddite, but still I am surprised to see Sony pushing its massively expensive 4K TVs when there’s almost no reason to buy one.
At the time of publishing, there are a handful of Sony films available in 4K via its Video Unlimited download service, and Netflix is streaming Breaking Bad and House of Cards in 4K (but reports say that it’s still hampered by compression). But, significantly, there’s absolutely no 4K broadcast TV and no 4K optical discs (Blu-ray doesn’t support 4K) — and there probably won’t be for years to come.
A Sony 4K TV camera. You are probably looking at around $100,000 of kit.
More interestingly, the BBC is also using the 2014 World Cup for 4K testing. The BBC will beam a live 4K video feed, via satellite, to BBC headquarters in the UK. The BBC says the 4K footage will then be broadcast to a handful of 4K TVs in its “research and development facilities” via digital terrestrial TV (DVB-T2) and internet streaming. The newer DVB-T2 broadcast digital TV standard is capable of data rates in the region of 20-30Mbps, which in theory is capable of carrying a 4K video feed (albeit compressed). And yes, in case you’re wondering, ~20Mbps sustained is what you’ll need for a half-decent 4K stream from Netflix (or Sony or FIFA).
The BBC appears to be the exception, though. There are almost no 4K tests being carried out elsewhere in the world. There were hints of a new Blu-ray standard that would support 4K back at the beginning of 2014, but in a more recent press conference Sony refused to answer any questions about it. The good news is that HDMI 2.0, ratified late last year, does support 4K — but HDMI 2.0 TVs and media streamers still haven’t hit the market.
Sony’s
84-inch 4K TV. But that’s the problem: Right now, unless you want to
look at pretty photos of flowers, there isn’t much in the way of 4K
content.
The most likely route towards 4K content is with modern smartphones, tablets, TVs, and PCs that support H.265/HEVC hardware decompression, and then providing the 4K source material via the internet — that way you can avoid the mess of Blu-ray/media streamer/HDMI support. In this scenario, Netflix and Amazon definitely have the edge in leading us towards 4K (though there are certainly not many internet connections in the world that can sustain 20Mbps, especially with the ongoing Netflix/Verizon/Comcast spat). If the BBC 4K DVB-T2 test goes off without a hitch, it’s possible that BBC/Freeview won’t be too far behind Netflix and Amazon.
But in either case, I really can’t recommend that you buy a 4K TV just yet. They have come down in price significantly — but you’re still better off waiting another 12 months, at which point you’ll actually have some content to enjoy, and you’ll be able to get a higher-quality panel at a much lower price. I know that TVs are still considered a “big purchase,” a bit like a new car or fridge, and many people are tempted to buy a very expensive TV every 5-10 years, but I assure you that you’ll be happier (and enjoy better picture quality and modern features) if you buy a more reasonably priced TV every 24 months instead.
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Add Your Comment Below